Technology provides us with a more balanced and engaging classroom environment. Through the multimodal approach, we expose students to a variety of ways to receive information, such as print, pictures, and videos (Lankshear and Knobel, 2013, p. 24). From the reading, the point that stood out the most to me was, how adolescents are engaged in various forms of communication in which they use many sources daily (Lankshear and Knobel, 2013, p. 24). According to the graphical representation of GREEN's approach to literacy, this adolescent engagement can be seen in the operational literary practice. Students use a language system that ranges in context. The environment where students engage in this hybrid communication is mostly outside of school because that is where it is most common for them to interact with others. In considering this idea and the information learned from the chapters and knowing that technology can be applied to multiple subjects in school, I reflected on my own practices in the classroom (Durrant, 2000).
During the pandemic, I created a non-fiction research unit online for my students. We were fully remote however, I had to address this topic with my students as a curriculum requirement. I was able to create groups, outlines, guides for researching, communicating, and collaborations. Going into the project, I knew what my students' abilities were. I knew they were able to use Google Classroom, Google Meets, use Google Slides to create their presentations, and access digital reading material online on Sora. Reflecting on this from page 26 in the text, I acted similar to Mr. Cardenas, because I focused my lessons on non-fiction text features, instead of how to access them because I knew my class could find the resources (Lankshear and Knobel, 2013). I was not physically with my students so I had to trust that they were on the appropriate documents and resources during our live class time. I was able to guide the students to successful presentations at the end of the unit by setting guidelines and expectations every week. This helped them pace themselves and be more independent from me. The students kept daily journals, which were checked weekly, they created multiple slides on their assigned person and presented with their group. The students even set up a time after class to meet with their group to rehearse their presentations before the actual due date. In believing in their abilities and tailoring the project to their interest they had the tools and support to be successful. The students added videos, text, images, audio, and hyperlinks to their presentations. They were suggested in the outline and all groups were successful in the integration. In viewing the graphical representation of GREEN's approach to literacy, the cultural component in the project can also be seen. The students developed an understanding using multiple resources and developed an understanding of the content and context of all the sources.
The issue in this is that there must be clear expectations and consequences to ensure students are using the technological resources appropriately and making the most of their learning time (Lankshear and Knobel, 2013, p. 27). This was a concern for parents and of mine in issuing this project. However, as I am nearing this unit again this year, I am envisioning it with the use of Chromebooks in the classroom. I hope to engage my students and make them feel comfortable and interested in researching for their projects. My ultimate vision is to allow for traditional print and notebook writing, but a final product to be on Google Slides. Sometimes for parents and educators, it is difficult to view the good of technology, because personally, we have only experienced a small sample in our education and are new to the current possibilities. We have to embrace the interest and the facility to allow multimodal resources and methods in the classroom.
References
Durrant, C and Green, B (2000). Literacy and the New Technologies in School
Education: Meeting the L(IT)eracy Challenge? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy.
Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2013). A New Literacies Reader: Educational Perspectives. Peter
Lang Publishing, Inc: New York.